Report attached (exempt appendices and grounds not available to press or public).

In accordance with paragraph 17 of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee Rules, a requisition signed by six Members representing more than one Group (Councillors Gerry O’Sullivan, Phillip Ruck, Mandy Anderson, Kathy Tumilty, David Godwin and Matthew Stanton) had called in the Key Executive Decision dated 3 January 2023.

The authorisation to award a contract for the extension and modification of Central Depot was linked to the public realm contract that has already been let. Councillors had stated that they were unaware of the full costs for the extension and modification of Central Depot at the time of the initial meeting of the Places Overview and Scrutiny Sub-Committee to carry out pre-decision scrutiny of the public realm contract on 8^th December 2022.

A procedural motion was proposed that, given the grounds of the requisition, only made reference to the decision in respect of the authorisation to award a contract for the extension and modification of Central Depot, that the debate and any subsequent vote on the requisition should relate to the extension and modification of Central Depot only. The procedural motion was proposed by Councillor Gerry O’Sullivan and seconded by Councillor Phillip Ruck. The procedural motion was agreed unanimously.

Officers responded to the grounds for call in through a presentation and written report.

It was noted that there was a contingency arrangement in the estimated cost of works to cover any potential increase in costs such as supplier chain risks. Officers answered Members’ questions concerning how the preferred bidder was selected and this included officers evaluating Local Authority references and quality of work, all of which, along with the other evaluation criteria was included in the full, exempt report submitted at the Places OSSC meeting on 8^th December 2022.  

Officers responded to Members in relation to how the evaluation took into account if suppliers elected to use the Council’s operational site or their own. There was a discussion around costs of capital borrowing and officers presented the Council’s assumptions on this.

The requisition of the Key Executive Decision for authorisation to award a contract for the extension and modification of Central Depot was not upheld.

The requisition was NOT UPHELD by 10 votes to 1.

Members voting not to uphold the requisition:

Councillor Gerry O’Sullivan

Councillor Philip Ruck

Councillor Laurance Garrard

Councillor Patricia Brown

Councillor Timothy Ryan

Councillor Christine Smith

Councillor Natasha Summers

Councillor David Taylor

Councillor Katharine Tumilty

Councillor Bryan Vincent

Members voting to uphold the requisition:

Councillor Martin Goode

The Board further requested the following recommendations to be noted:

-          All agendas including partially exempt and completely exempt items, should be open to councillors to access for effective scrutiny for their respective committees. Officers are to email members when agendas and documentation are available.

-          Reports for new projects should only be brought to Committee meetings and Cabinet when all the relevant information is available especially noting capital costs, the associated chargeable interest to the general fund and the impact of such expenditure on Council resources.  If for any reason this cannot be detailed in the report, sufficient reasoning must be stated as to why. As an example future benefits of the project , not already incorporated and quantified in budget/financial assessments,  will exceed by far the costs associated with the potential additional  revenue and capital expenditure.

The requisition of the Key Executive Decision for authorisation to award a contract for the extension and modification of Central Depot was NOT UPHELD which meant the decision could be implemented with immediate effect as set out in the Key Executive Decision report.