Agenda and draft minutes

The Chairman will announce details of the arrangements in case of fire or other events that might require the meeting room or building’s evacuation.

To receive (if any)

Members are invited to disclose any interests in any of the items on the agenda at this point of the meeting.  Members may still declare an interest in an item at any time prior to the consideration of the matter.

Co-optee Ian Rusha disclosed a non-pecuniary interest as a member of the National Education Union (NEU).

Report attached

Officers explained to members that the new Home to School Transport Scheme Policy was not yet available as the consultation had just closed and the data had not yet been compiled to allow the service to draft the new policy. As such, officers talked through the findings and responses to the consultation.

It was explained to members that the consultation had received over 550 responses from mainly parents or guardians of children with SEND. It was explained the consultation was online-only and no paper version were sent to service users. Members expressed concern an online-only approach could cause some service users to be missed or unable to respond. Officers explained guidance allows for online-only consultations but understood the concerns raised by members.

The consultation comprised of 8 questions and members noted the following responses. Question 1 asked if the new policy would positively impact on their own or their families’ employment to which 397 responded and ?57% disagreed. Question 2 asked if the new policy would make their lives easier to which 397 responded and ?60% disagreed.  Question 3 asked if the new policy would positively impact on their own or their child’s mental health to which 410 responded and ?55% disagreed. Question 4 asked if the new policy would give them greater flexibility and financial independence to which 407 responded and ?58% disagreed. Question 5 asked if the new policy would improve school attendance to which 405 responded and ?61% disagreed. Question 6 asked if they worried about managing a personal transport budget to which 383 responded and ?67% agreed. Question 7 asked if the Post 16 TA should be capped at a maximum amount to which 362 responded and ?59% agreed. Question 8 asked if the Post 16 TA should be means tested to which 465 responded and ?51% agreed.

The Chairman of the Sub-Committee then allowed a representative of the service users to speak about their views on the consultation. The representative explained the consultation felt like a guilt trip to parents and the changes felt forced. Officers responded that there were lessons learnt from the consultation process.

Officers then explained the new policy would only affect children making application to start school in September 2025 and any child currently receiving home to school transport that could be affected by the policy change would be worked closely with by the council’s children services team. Officers also explained that the new policy was focused on reducing the number of parents using single-use taxis as those means are overpriced and better solutions could be found for the child and their needs, involving an individual assessment of the child and not a ‘blanket approach’. The new special schools due to be built in the Borough would see a reduction in children travelling out-of-borough to special schools and would in turn reduce the number of families utilising single-use taxis.

Members suggested the policy should be made available in an easy-to-read and children’s version. Officers confirmed they would work with other teams  ...  view the full minutes text for item 80.