Venue: Council Chamber, Town Hall, Main Road, Romford RM1 3BD
Contact: Taiwo Adeoye 01708 433079, Richard Cursons 01708 432430 or Victoria Freeman 01708 433862 Email: taiwo.adeoye@onesource.co.uk Email: richard.cursons@onesource.co.uk Email: victoria.freeman@onesource.co.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS Members are invited to disclose any interest in any of the items on the agenda at this point of the meeting.
Members may still disclose any interest in an item at any time prior to the consideration of the matter. Minutes: There were no disclosures of interest. |
|
To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 13 September 2018 and to authorise the Chairman to sign them. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on the 13 September 2018 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. |
|
P1156.18 - ALBANY SCHOOL, BROADSTONE ROAD PDF 270 KB Decision: The Committee was addressed by Councillor Ciaran White.
The Committee considered the report and RESOLVED to agree the recommendation to GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION and that the Head of Planning is delegated authority to issue the planning permission and impose conditions and informatives to secure those matters as set out in the report.
Minutes: The Committee was addressed by Councillor Ciaran White.
The Committee considered the report and RESOLVED to agree the recommendation to GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION and that the Head of Planning is delegated authority to issue the planning permission and impose conditions and informatives to secure those matters as set out in the report.
|
|
P0048.18 - 112-116 SOUTH STREET PDF 288 KB Decision: The Committee was addressed by Councillor Joshua Chapman.
The report recommended that planning permission be granted, however following a motion to refuse the granting of planning permission it was RESOLVED that planning PERMISSION BE REFUSED for the following reasons;
· The proposal, by reason of its design, would fail to integrate satisfactorily with the retained non-designated heritage asset, thereby resulting in harm to its visual integrity, contrary to Policies CP18 and DC67 of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, the Council’s Heritage SPD, Policy 7.8 of the London Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
· The proposal, by reason of its height and the lack of comparably tall buildings nearby, would fail to respect the character of Romford Town Centre, contrary to Policies DC61 and DC66 of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, ROM19 of the Romford Area Action Plan and 2.15 of the London Plan.
Councillors Linda Hawthorn and Keith Darvill voted against the resolution.
Councillor Graham Williamson abstained from voting.
Minutes: The Committee was addressed by Councillor Joshua Chapman.
The report recommended that planning permission be granted, however following a motion to refuse the granting of planning permission it was RESOLVED that planning PERMISSION BE REFUSED for the following reasons;
· The proposal, by reason of its design, would fail to integrate satisfactorily with the retained non-designated heritage asset, thereby resulting in harm to its visual integrity, contrary to Policies CP18 and DC67 of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, the Council’s Heritage SPD, Policy 7.8 of the London Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
· The proposal, by reason of its height and the lack of comparably tall buildings nearby, would fail to respect the character of Romford Town Centre, contrary to Policies DC61 and DC66 of the Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, ROM19 of the Romford Area Action Plan and 2.15 of the London Plan.
Councillors Linda Hawthorn and Keith Darvill voted against the resolution.
Councillor Graham Williamson abstained from voting.
|
|
P1057.17 - 165-193 NEW ROAD PDF 256 KB Decision: The Committee received an update on the application from Officers.
Following a motion, the Committee RESOLVED to DEFER consideration of the application. Minutes: The Committee received an update on the application from Officers.
Following a motion, the Committee RESOLVED to DEFER consideration of the application. |