Agenda and minutes

oneSource Joint Committee - Friday, 2nd September, 2016 9.30 am

Venue: Newham Dockside

Contact: Andrew Beesley, Committee Administration Manager  Email: andrew.beesley@onesource.co.uk

Items
No. Item

10.

Exclusion of the public

To consider whether the public should now be excluded from the remainder of the meeting on the grounds that it is likely that, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, if members of the public were present during these items there would be disclosure to them of exempt information within the meaning of paragraph 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972; and, if it is decided to exclude the public on these grounds, the Sub-Committee to resolve accordingly on the motion of the Chairman.

Minutes:

On a motion by the Chairman the Committee RESOLVED:

 

That the public be excluded from the remainder of the meeting on the

grounds that it was likely that, in view of the nature of the business to be

transacted or the nature of the proceedings, if members of the public were

present during those items there would be disclosure to them of exempt

information within the meaning of paragraph 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local

Government Act 1972

11.

APPOINTMENT TO THE POST OF DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION

A covering report, CV and covering letter (except for candidate 1) are provided for each candidate

Minutes:

The Committee interviewed three applicants for appointment to this position. It carefully considered their respective merits and satisfied itself as to their competency by reference to their written profiles, oral presentations and the answers to questions concerning the role and by wider questioning.

 

The Joint Committee felt that one candidate in particular had more relevant experience in delivering a shared service arrangement which was of particular importance moving forward for oneSource. In addition, that candidate also demonstrated a real passion and enthusiasm for delivering the oneSource vision.

 

The Joint Committee therefore had no hesitation in deciding which of the candidates it would recommend for appointment and indicated a provisional intention to make an offer to that candidate.