Agenda, decisions and minutes

LONDON FOOD CENTRE, Licensing Sub-Committee - Tuesday, 16th September, 2014 10.30 am

Venue: Council Chamber - Town Hall. View directions

Contact: James Goodwin 01708 432432  Email: james.goodwin@onesource.co.uk

Items
No. Item

1.

APPLICATION FOR A PREMISES LICENCE FOR LONDON FOOD CENTRE, 271 LONDON ROAD, ROMFORD. pdf icon PDF 4 MB

Application for a premises licence at London Food Centre, 271 London Road, Romford, RM7 9NJ.

 

Decision:

Licensing Act 2003

Notice of Decision

 

PREMISES

 

London Food Centre,

271 London Road,

Romford,

RM7 9NJ

 

DETAILS OF APPLICATION

 

An application for a premises licence under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 (‘the Act’).

 

APPLICANT

 

Miss Cansu Eren,

166 Edgecot Road,

Tottenham,

London.

N15 5HH

 

1.           Details of the application:

 

The application is for a premises licence as follows:

 

Supply of alcohol (off premises), recorded music & hours open to the public

Day

Start

Finish

Monday to Saturday

08:00

23:00

Sunday

08:00

22:30

 

During his response to the representations submitted by the Responsible Authorities the applicant’s solicitor withdrew the application for recorded music.

 

2.            Seasonal variations

 

There are no seasonal variations applied for in this application.

 

3.            Non-standard timings

 

There are no non-standard timings applied for in this application.

 

4.            Comments and observations on the application

 

The applicant acted in accordance with regulations 25 and 26 of the Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005 relating to the advertising of the application. The required public notice was installed in the 1 August 2014 edition of the Romford Recorder.

 

The Licencing Officer in his report raised concerns regarding the plan which had been submitted with the application. The plan showed a bold red line around the perimeter of the premises. This red line delineated the ambit of licensing activities. This meant that the non-public areas i.e. the kitchen and store room could be used for the supply of alcohol.

 

In his presentation the solicitor acting for the applicant advised that the plan was in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 23 of the Premises Licences Regulations which stated that the plan should show:

 

·         The extent of the boundary of the building and any external and interior walls of a building and if different the perimeter of the premises.

·         In the case where the premises are used for more than one existing licensable activity, the area within the premises used for each such activity.

 

He maintained that the plan met all these requirements. In consultation with his client he advised that no more than 30% (approximately) of the selling space would be used to display alcohol.

 

5.            Summary

 

There were no representations made against this application from interested parties.

 

There were four representations made against the application from responsible authorities.

 

6.            Details of Representations

 

Valid representations may only address the following licensing objectives:

 

·         The prevention of crime and disorder;

·         The prevention of public nuisance;

·         The protection of children from harm;

·         Public safety.

 

7.            Representations

 

Interested parties’ representations

 

There were no representations from interested parties.

 

 

Responsible Authorities’ representations

 

i)     Trading Standards

 

The representation from Trading Standards addressed the following objectives:

 

(1)  Protection of Children from Harm; and

(2)  Prevention of Crime and Disorder.

 

The Trading Standards Manager stated that the London Food centre was a small family business and he was not convinced that the change of Designated Premises Supervisor to another member of the family, who had worked at the premises before, would change anything.

 

If the sub-committee  ...  view the full decision text for item 1.

Minutes:

 

PREMISES

 

London Food Centre,

271 London Road,

Romford,

RM7 9NJ

 

DETAILS OF APPLICATION

 

An application for a premises licence under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 (‘the Act’).

 

APPLICANT

 

Miss Cansu Eren,

166 Edgecot Road,

Tottenham,

London.

N15 5HH

 

1.           Details of the application:

 

The application is for a premises licence as follows:

 

Supply of alcohol (off premises), recorded music & hours open to the public

Day

Start

Finish

Monday to Saturday

08:00

23:00

Sunday

08:00

22:30

 

During his response to the representations submitted by the Responsible Authorities the applicant’s solicitor withdrew the application for recorded music.

 

2.            Seasonal variations

 

There are no seasonal variations applied for in this application.

 

3.            Non-standard timings

 

There are no non-standard timings applied for in this application.

 

4.            Comments and observations on the application

 

The applicant acted in accordance with regulations 25 and 26 of the Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005 relating to the advertising of the application. The required public notice was installed in the 1 August 2014 edition of the Romford Recorder.

 

The Licencing Officer in his report raised concerns regarding the plan which had been submitted with the application. The plan showed a bold red line around the perimeter of the premises. This red line delineated the ambit of licensing activities. This meant that the non-public areas i.e. the kitchen and store room could be used for the supply of alcohol.

 

In his presentation the solicitor acting for the applicant advised that the plan was in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 23 of the Premises Licences Regulations which stated that the plan should show:

 

·         The extent of the boundary of the building and any external and interior walls of a building and if different the perimeter of the premises.

·         In the case where the premises are used for more than one existing licensable activity, the area within the premises used for each such activity.

 

He maintained that the plan met all these requirements. In consultation with his client he advised that no more than 30% (approximately) of the selling space would be used to display alcohol.

 

5.            Summary

 

There were no representations made against this application from interested parties.

 

There were four representations made against the application from responsible authorities.

 

6.            Details of Representations

 

Valid representations may only address the following licensing objectives:

 

·         The prevention of crime and disorder;

·         The prevention of public nuisance;

·         The protection of children from harm;

·         Public safety.

 

7.            Representations

 

Interested parties’ representations

 

There were no representations from interested parties.

 

 

Responsible Authorities’ representations

 

i)     Trading Standards

 

The representation from Trading Standards addressed the following objectives:

 

(1)  Protection of Children from Harm; and

(2)  Prevention of Crime and Disorder.

 

The Trading Standards Manager stated that the London Food centre was a small family business and he was not convinced that the change of Designated Premises Supervisor to another member of the family, who had worked at the premises before, would change anything.

 

If the sub-committee were to grant the licence he  ...  view the full minutes text for item 1.