Agenda, decisions and minutes
PDF 123 KBVenue: Council Chamber - Town Hall. View directions
Contact: Taiwo Adeoye - 01708 433079 Email: taiwo.adeoye@havering.gov.uk
| No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Application for a premises licence at Damynes Hall Aerodrome, Aveley Road, Upminster RM14 2TN. - Report attached Decision: Licensing Act 2003 Notice of Decision
PREMISES Damyns Hall Aerodrome Aveley Road Upminster RM14 2TN
DETAILS OF APPLICATION
An application for a premises licence made under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 (“the Act”).
APPLICANTS Lime Green Events Limited 65A Station Road Upminster RM14 2SU
1. Details of the application:
The application is for an annual event to take place on the Saturday and Sunday of the Spring Bank Holiday (end May) each year.
Seasonal variations
There were no seasonal variations applied for in the application.
Non-standard timings
There were no non-standard timings applied for in the application.
2. Promotion of the licensing objectives:
The applicant acted in accordance with premises licence regulations 25 and 26 of the Licensing Act 2003 Regulations 2005 relating to the advertising of the application. The required public notice was installed in the Yellow Advertiser on Wednesday 31 July 2013.
3. Details of representations
Valid representations may only address the following licensing objectives:
The prevention of crime and disorder The prevention of public nuisance The protection of children from harm Public safety
There were six valid representations received against the application from interested parties.
There were two representations received against the application from responsible authorities from the London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority and Environmental Health.
Environmental Health had also reached an agreement with the applicant that the event plan will be subject to approval by the Safety Advisory Group (SAG) at least six weeks prior to the event.
The representation against the application details concerns over the close proximity to nearby residential properties and being contrary to Licensing Policy 012.
Following the production of the agenda, The London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority notified that the issues regarding their representation have now been addressed to the Authority’s satisfaction, stating that the applicant has agreed to the proposed condition being placed on the licence. Accordingly, the authority is withdrawing its representation.
Representation from interested parties
At the hearing on 9 September 2013 the following persons made oral representations to the subcommittee: Mrs P Gladman, Mr N Drew and Mrs M Sheriiff-Geary
The interested parties representations addressed all four of the licensing objectives. There were six valid representations against this application from interested parties. It was contended, in summary, that the application would introduce alcohol into the area and that unless policed properly then there could be issues of crime and disorder. The representations also addressed the public safety objective by claiming that the increased traffic to the area would be detrimental to public safety. Four of the objectors attended the hearing and reiterated their written representation against the application as applied for. The representation also contended that public nuisance would arise from noise created by ... view the full decision text for item 1. Minutes:
PREMISES Damyns Hall Aerodrome Aveley Road Upminster RM14 2TN
DETAILS OF APPLICATION
An application for a premises licence made under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 (“the Act”).
APPLICANTS Lime Green Events Limited 65A Station Road Upminster RM14 2SU
1. Details of the application:
The application is for an annual event to take place on the Saturday and Sunday of the Spring Bank Holiday (end May) each year.
Seasonal variations
There were no seasonal variations applied for in the application.
Non-standard timings
There were no non-standard timings applied for in the application.
2. Promotion of the licensing objectives:
The applicant acted in accordance with premises licence regulations 25 and 26 of the Licensing Act 2003 Regulations 2005 relating to the advertising of the application. The required public notice was installed in the Yellow Advertiser on Wednesday 31 July 2013.
3. Details of representations
Valid representations may only address the following licensing objectives:
The prevention of crime and disorder The prevention of public nuisance The protection of children from harm Public safety
There were six valid representations received against the application from interested parties.
There were two representations received against the application from responsible authorities from the London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority and Environmental Health.
Environmental Health had also reached an agreement with the applicant that the event plan will be subject to approval by the Safety Advisory Group (SAG) at least six weeks prior to the event.
The representation against the application details concerns over the close proximity to nearby residential properties and being contrary to Licensing Policy 012.
Following the production of the agenda, The London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority notified that the issues regarding their representation have now been addressed to the Authority’s satisfaction, stating that the applicant has agreed to the proposed condition being placed on the licence. Accordingly, the authority is withdrawing its representation.
Representation from interested parties
At the hearing on 9 September 2013 the following persons made oral representations to the subcommittee: Mrs P Gladman, Mr N Drew and Mrs M Sheriiff-Geary
The interested parties representations addressed all four of the licensing objectives. There were six valid representations against this application from interested parties. It was contended, in summary, that the application would introduce alcohol into the area and that unless policed properly then there could be issues of crime and disorder. The representations also addressed the public safety objective by claiming that the increased traffic to the area would be detrimental to public safety. Four of the objectors attended the hearing and reiterated their written representation against the application as applied for. The representation also contended that public nuisance would arise from noise created by live music and additional lighting. They ... view the full minutes text for item 1. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||