Agenda and minutes

To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 7 June 2016, and to authorise the Chairman to sign them.

The minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 7 June 2016 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

The Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that the following measures be implemented:

1.         Freight loading bay outside Sainsbury’s Local in Suttons Lane, Hornchurch in Suttons Lane, Hornchurch, the west side, from the common boundary of property Nos. 2A and 2B, Suttons Lane extending northward for a distance of 18.8 metres.

Members noted that the estimated cost for implementation was £1,500 and would be met by the developer paid through fees linked to an agreement for highway works made under S38/S278 of the Highways Act 1980 as amended.

Following clarification that the list of casualty locations was detailed in the report and clarification of the drawing reference numbers referred to in the recommendation , the Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that the following measures be implemented:

(a)  Rainham Road between Wood Lane and Sowrey Avenue (Plan No: QP003/1)

-       Speed table as shown

-       30mph with slow down vehicle activated sign as shown

-        

(b)  Rainham Road between Sowrey Avenue and Simpson Road (Plan No.:QP003/2)

-       Humped zebra crossing outside Property No. 12 Bretons Cottages, Rainham Road

(c)  Rainham Road between Simpson Road and Ford Lane

    (Plan Nos. QP003/3, QP003/4 and QP003/8)

-       Speed tables (2No.) as shown

-       Rumble strips as shown

-       White refelective studs as shown

(d)   Rainham Road between Ford Lane and Newtons Corner Roundabout   (Plan No. QP003/5)

-       30mph with slow down vehicle activated as shown.

Members noted that the estimated cost of £64,000 would be met from the Transport for London’s (TfL) 2016/17 Local Implementation Plan allocation  for Accident Reduction Programme.

The Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that:

a)        the proposed ‘At Any Time’ waiting restrictions in Osborne Road, be implemented as advertised;

b)        the effect of the scheme be monitored.

Members noted that the estimated cost for the proposals was £900 and would  be met from the 2016/17 Minor Parking Schemes budget.

The Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that:

a)        the proposed ‘At Any Time’ waiting restrictions in Lamson Road, be implemented as advertised;

b)        the effect of the scheme be monitored.

Members noted that the estimated cost for the proposals was £1000 and would met from the 2016/17 Minor Parking Schemes budget.

The Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that:

a)        the proposed ‘At Any Time’ waiting restrictions in Station Parade, be implemented as advertised;

b)        the effect of the scheme be monitored.

Members noted that the estimated cost for the proposals was £900 and would  be met from the 2016/17 Minor Parking Schemes budget.

Further to clarification that five staff with permit would benefit from the proposal, the Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment:

a)        the proposed inclusion Viking Way Car Park into the ‘Council Staff Permit Holders’ scheme, be implemented as advertised;

b)        the effect of the scheme be monitored.

Members noted that the estimated cost for the proposals was £500 and would  be met from the 2016/17 Minor Parking Schemes budget.

The Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that the proposed changes to the parking bays along Marshalls Road, as shown on the plan (Ref: Marshalls Road - TPC811) be publicly advertised and consulted with a further report detailing the consultation responses referred back to the Committee to agree a further course of action.

The Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that:

a.         The proposals to extend the Romford CPZ (Sector RO2B) residents parking scheme in Pretoria Road, between No. 165 -173 odds and No.126 on the even side, be implemented as advertised.

b.         The effect of any agreed proposals to be monitored.

Members noted that the estimated cost of the scheme was £500 and would be funded from the 2016/17 Minor Parking Schemes budget.

The voting was 10 votes in favour to one abstention.

Following clarification that the objection to the proposal related to the positioning of the loading bay which had now been resolved through a revision in the scheme design, the Committee considered the report and without debate RESOLVED to recommend to the Cabinet Member for Environment that the following measures be implemented:

The proposed provision of an allocated loading bay; operational 7am -11am seven days a week, in Moray Way for the businesses to use for loading and unloading purposes but only within the limited time of operation which would  be 7am – 11am, seven days a week, as shown on the plan appended to the report at Appendix C, be publicly advertised and consulted with a further report detailing the responses to the consultation be referred back to the Committee to agree a further course of action.

The Committee is requested to consider the report relating to work in progress and applications - Report attached

The Committee considered a report showing all the new highway scheme requests in order for a decision to be made on whether the scheme should progress or not before resources were expended on detailed design and consultation.

The Committee had considered and agreed in principle the schedule that detailed the applications received by the service.

The Committee’s decisions were noted as against each request and are appended to the minutes.

The Committee is requested to consider the report relating to minor traffic and parking schemes - Report attached

The report before the Committee had detailed all Minor Traffic and Parking Scheme application requests in order for a decision to be made on whether the scheme should progress or not before resources were expended on detailed design and consultation.

The Committee had considered and agreed in principle the schedule that detailed the applications received by the service.

The Committee’s decisions were noted as against each request and appended to the minutes.