Report attached

The Committee received an application to vary condition No. 1 (Accordance with plans) of reserved matters approval ref: P0112.22 dated 19/10/2022 and to substitute the approved plans. The application for reserved matters sought approval of appearance, landscaping, layout and scale pursuant to condition 1 replacing drawing numbers of outline planning permission (P0248.19) dated 16 September 2021 for the demolition of all buildings and structures on site.

The report outlined that planning application was approved by the committee in July 2020 subject to conditions and a section 106 legal agreement to change the use of land and to develop the site to provide 37 dwelling. At the reserved matters stage, the scheme was revised to incorporate 35 dwellings, approved by the Strategic Planning Committee in October 2022.

The application had been called–in by Ward Councillors. With its agreement Councillor John Tyler addressed the Committee and raised concerns over the current proposal and sought further discussions to take place over the £55,000 offered to further enhance play facilities in the local area, the refusal of the leasing of the land and a revisit of the natural ‘play’ offer.

The report recommended approval of the reserved matters subject to the completion of a Deed of Variation to the original legal agreement to secure the planning obligations.

Following debate, it was RESOLVED to DEFER in order for officers to seek further clarification from the applicant on the following:

1.    Identify the location where the financial contribution would be spent.

2.    Provide fuller details of what the contribution would fund.

3.    Consider an enhanced increase to the contribution.

4.    Details of what the cost of the equipment would have been it it was installed on the site.

5.    What is would cost at the new location and where that site would be.

The motion for deferral was raised by Councillor Best and was seconded by Councillor Patel.

The vote for the proposal was carried by 5 votes to 1 against. Councillor Laurence Garrard voted against the motion.