Update on the work and future plans of the Health and Wellbeing Board.
Minutes:
The Chairman of the Health and Wellbeing Board (Cllr. Kelly) explained that the Board’s overall aim was to ensure an across the borough approach to both health and social care. The Board membership numbered twelve people including four Councillors, the Group Director for Social Services and the Director of Public Health. A representative of the Local Healthwatch for Havering would also join in April. This representative would be appointed by Local Healthwatch themselves and not by the Council. The Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) was also represented.
No Government funding had been received to set up the Health and Wellbeing Board and other funding had been used to run 19 projects. These covered areas such as the number of rehab beds, falls, telecare, strokes and COPD. Each project was run jointly between the Council and health partners.
The Board also wished to have GP surgeries open, on a rota basis, on Saturdays and Sundays. The CCG would check that savings generated by the projects were reinvested into the brought. Another role of the Health and Wellbeding Board would be to agree the final budget of the CCG although this would be undertaken in partnership with the CCG itself.
The Health and Wellbeing Board also produced the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment and it was hoped to produce local health statistics as this would allow effective pre-emption of health problems in Havering. It was hoped this would reduce both numbers of people going into hospital and rates of readmission.
There were seven priorities for the Health and Wellbeing Board:
There would be more community based and provision of reablement. Fifteen more beds were opening in Royal Jubilee Court. There would also be a move to allow more initial reablement to take place in people’s homes.
Enter and view visits would be undertaken by Healthwatch. The Chairman of the Health and Wellbeing Board felt that it was important that such visits were undertaken by skilled and trained people something that, in his view, had not always been the case under Havering LINk. A LINk representative responded that all LINk members were required to undergo a full day’s training course and have a Criminal Records Bureau check before they were allowed to undertake any visits. Quality assurance of enter and view visits would be the responsibility of the Healthwatch board.
Communication of the health strategy would, in some instances, be the responsibility of bodies such as the NHS Commissioning Board or the Public Health Board. Locally, Living Magazine etc. could also be used.
The Health and Wellbeing Board Chairman felt that the capacity of GPs would need to be considered. There was no obligation on the CCG to fund Queen’s Hospital and more money should be retained to be put into local primary care.
The Data Protection Act was a problem in attempts tom help vulnerable older people as it was not possible to obtain information on local people above certain ages. Work was in progress with the NHS to try and improve this. The numbers of people in non-acute beds who lived alone was monitored and people on over 65 medical checks were also signposted to Council activities.
The Board chairman agreed that it was important that all potentially vulnerable older people were seen. The Activate Havering project aimed to contact isolated people and it was also being investigated how people not on benefits or funded social care could be contacted.
The Committee noted the update on the Health and Wellbeing Board.