Agenda, decisions and minutes
PDF 143 KBVenue: Council Chamber - Town Hall. View directions
Contact: Taiwo Adeoye - 01708 433079 Email: taiwo.adeoye@onesource.co.uk
| No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
APPLICATION FOR A PREMISES LICENCE - NES CAFE 9 BILLET LANE, HORNCHURCH, RM11 1TS Decision: Licensing Act 2003 Notice of Decision
PREMISES Nes Cafe 9 Billet Lane Hornchurch RM11 1TS
DETAILS OF APPLICATION
The application for a premises license was made under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 (“the Act)
APPLICANT Mr Oktay Senturk 9 Billet Lane Hornchurch RM11 1TS
1. Details of requested licensable activities
The application is to permit:
The premises is located in St Andrews ward which was subject to a special policy further to cumulative impact. Licensing Policy 2 states:
The Licensing Authority had adopted a special policy relating to cumulative impact in relation to:
· Romford town centre within the ring road · St Andrews Ward
The policy creates a rebuttable presumption that applications for new premises licences, club premises certificates, or variation applications that would to add to the existing cumulative impact, will normally be refused, unless the applicant can demonstrate why the operation of the premises involved will not add to the cumulative impact and not impact adversely on the promotion of the licensing objectives. The exception to this policy will be for applications for restaurants where alcohol is sold ancillary to a table meal and the terminal licensing hour is in line with the policy.
2. Promotion of the Licensing Objectives
The applicant acted in accordance with regulations 25 and 26 of The Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005 relating to the advertisements of the application. The required public notice was installed in the 9 June 2017 edition of the Romford Recorder.
At the suggestion of the Licensing Authority it was put forward that Premises Licence Annex 2, Conditions 1,3,4,5,6 could be removed; this in line with the section 182 Licensing Act guidance issued by the Government. The applicant had agreed to this suggestion.
3. Details of Representations
There was one representation against the application from an interested person. The representation was based on the grounds of Public Safety and the Prevention of public nuisance.
There was a representation against the application from a responsible authority; Havering’s Licensing Authority.
4. Determination of Application
Mr Paul Campbell, Havering Licensing Officer attended the hearing and reiterated his representation to the application. The Sub-Committee was informed that the application for a Premises Licence by the applicant had made no reference as to what type of venue it was intended to be and had failed to address fully in the operating schedule what would be done to promote the four licensing objectives.
The Licensing Officer indicated that the applicant had also failed to acknowledge that the venue was in a communitive impact area outlined in Havering's Statement of Licensing Policy and what measures would be put into place to make the application an exception to the policy.
The Sub-Committee noted that the representation as a Responsible Authority against the application under the licensing objectives were on the grounds of the Prevention of Crime and Disorder, Public Safety, Prevention of Public Nuisance and the Protection of ... view the full decision text for item 1. Minutes:
PREMISES Nes Cafe 9 Billet Lane Hornchurch RM11 1TS
DETAILS OF APPLICATION
The application for a premises license was made under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 (“the Act)
APPLICANT Mr Oktay Senturk 9 Billet Lane Hornchurch RM11 1TS
1. Details of requested licensable activities
The application is to permit:
The premises is located in St Andrews ward which was subject to a special policy further to cumulative impact. Licensing Policy 2 states:
The Licensing Authority had adopted a special policy relating to cumulative impact in relation to:
· Romford town centre within the ring road · St Andrews Ward
The policy creates a rebuttable presumption that applications for new premises licences, club premises certificates, or variation applications that would to add to the existing cumulative impact, will normally be refused, unless the applicant can demonstrate why the operation of the premises involved will not add to the cumulative impact and not impact adversely on the promotion of the licensing objectives. The exception to this policy will be for applications for restaurants where alcohol is sold ancillary to a table meal and the terminal licensing hour is in line with the policy.
2. Promotion of the Licensing Objectives
The applicant acted in accordance with regulations 25 and 26 of The Licensing Act 2003 (Premises licences and club premises certificates) Regulations 2005 relating to the advertisements of the application. The required public notice was installed in the 9 June 2017 edition of the Romford Recorder.
At the suggestion of the Licensing Authority it was put forward that Premises Licence Annex 2, Conditions 1,3,4,5,6 could be removed; this in line with the section 182 Licensing Act guidance issued by the Government. The applicant had agreed to this suggestion.
3. Details of Representations
There was one representation against the application from an interested person. The representation was based on the grounds of Public Safety and the Prevention of public nuisance.
There was a representation against the application from a responsible authority; Havering’s Licensing Authority.
4. Determination of Application
Mr Paul Campbell, Havering Licensing Officer attended the hearing and reiterated his representation to the application. The Sub-Committee was informed that the application for a Premises Licence by the applicant had made no reference as to what type of venue it was intended to be and had failed to address fully in the operating schedule what would be done to promote the four licensing objectives.
The Licensing Officer indicated that the applicant had also failed to acknowledge that the venue was in a communitive impact area outlined in Havering's Statement of Licensing Policy and what measures would be put into place to make the application an exception to the policy.
The Sub-Committee noted that the representation as a Responsible Authority against the application under the licensing objectives were on the grounds of the Prevention of Crime and Disorder, Public Safety, Prevention of Public Nuisance and the Protection of Children from Harm.
The Sub-Committee was ... view the full minutes text for item 1. |
|||||||||||||||||||