Agenda and minutes

Environment Overview & Scrutiny Sub-Committee - Tuesday, 24th April, 2012 7.30 pm

Venue: Town Hall, Main Road, Romford

Contact: Wendy Gough 01708 432441  Email: wendy.gough@havering.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

25.

MINUTES pdf icon PDF 64 KB

To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 31 January 2012  and authorise the Chairman to sign them.

 

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 31 January 2012 were agreed and signed by the Chairman.

 

26.

AGEING WELL REPORT pdf icon PDF 102 KB

Following the recent Ageing Well event considering priorities for older people in the borough, the attached report details some themes arising from the event that could be used as components of the overview and scrutiny committee’s work programme for the next municipal year.

 

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Committee Administration officers presented a report detailing the outcomes of the Ageing Well event held earlier in the year. This had been an event organised, with support from the Centre for Public Scrutiny, for stakeholders to consider issues impacting on the older population in Havering. Members were invited to review the issues and themes raised during the event and to consider which of these could be included within the Committee's work programme for the coming year.

 

The areas that the Committee agreed would be good to scrutinise were:

 

  • Slips, Trips and Falls attributed to highways
  • Transport (access to Queens and St Francis Hospice)
  • Bus Provisions
  • Subway Access to Romford Market
  • Roadways into the Parks – jointly with Towns and Communities OSC.
  • Blue Badge Scheme (assessment)

 

Members stated that the appendix was very good and should be used as a rolling update, they also agreed that it would be useful to find out what areas other OSCs are looking at, to identity any joint working.

 

A number of issues were raised about complaints from residents which the Head of Streetcare agreed to look at.

 

27.

REVIEW OF WASTE MANAGEMENT - BIFFA, ELWA, SHANKS pdf icon PDF 364 KB

The Committee will receive a presentation from the Head of Streetcare on the Waste Management Partnerships.

 

Minutes:

The Committee received a presentation on the Waste Management Partnerships within Havering.  These included Biffa the waste collection contractor, East London Waste Authority (ELWA) - the disposal company and Shanks East London - the disposal contractor.

 

Officers explained that Biffa provided the following services:

 

·        Household waste (black sacks)

·        Kerbside recycling (orange sacks)

·        Garden waste (green bins and sacks)

·        Trade Waste

·        Clinical Waste

·        Bulky Waste

 

 

The Committee were informed that ELWA had been established as a Statutory Waste Disposal Authority in 1986 and they managed approximately 500,000 tonnes of waste per year from the four London Boroughs in East London (Havering, Barking and Dagenham, Redbridge and Newham).  In 2002 ELWA awarded a 25 year PFI contract to Shanks.  The Integrated Waste Management Strategy set out measures to improve recycling and composting rates and to divert waste from landfill. This was the main goal for Havering.

 

Officers explained that in 2006 Cabinet agreed Havering’s Waste Strategy, This linked with ELWA’s headline strategy which would be in operation until 2020.  The key targets in both strategies included:

 

  • Giving priority to achieving statutory recycling and composting standards; 27% by 2007/08

 

  • Recycling or composting jointly 25% of waste in the period 2005/6 – 2009/10, 30% in the period 2010/11 – 2014/15 and 33% from 2015/16 onwards.

 

  • Working with ELWA to divert from landfill 40% of waste in the period 2007/08 – 2009/10, 45% in the period 2010/11 to 2014/15 and 67% thereafter.

 

The actual achievements of these targets included:

 

  • 35% of waste was recycled or composted.
  • Reduction of household waste by 11,000 tonnes since 2006/07.
  • ELWA diverted 52.3% of municipal waste from landfill in 2010/11.

 

The Committee noted that the achievements exceeded the targets within the strategies and that Havering’s figures were the highest of the four ELWA boroughs.  Officers explained how recycling had been increased through the introduction a wheeled bin garden waster collection and composting service, the separation of orange and black sack collections, improvements at Recycling and Reuse Centres (RRCs) together with other initiatives.  Members agreed that the Orange bag scheme was simple for householders to use, as all recycling materials went into one receptacle, and they were easier to store than large bins.  Members asked about the take up of the Green Bins.  Officers responded that the charge for the bins covered the running of the services and any promotions. They currently had 18,000 customers and were still growing by 1,000 a year, this would equate to approximately a fifth of the borough.

 

Waste minimisation campaigns had also been run to reduce the amount of waste produced, in the form of Love Food Hate Waste workshops, roadshows, leaflets, publications and Home Composting.  Members asked if there were Water Butts available through any of the schemes, given the recent hosepipe ban, and if provisions had been made for temporary recycling schemes to be installed at the caravan and camping sites during the Olympics.  Officers would update the Committee at the next meeting on both issues.

 

The Committee were informed  ...  view the full minutes text for item 27.

28.

MONITORING OF HIGHWAY REPAIRS

The Committee will receive an update on the monitoring of highway repairs in the Borough.

 

Minutes:

The Committee received a briefing note on the inspections undertaken to monitor the public highway.  These were:

 

Planned and ad hoc routine safety highway inspections – There were two categories of safety inspection, proactive and reactive.  The majority of safety inspections were proactive and undertaken in a planned way during daylight hours.  Inspections were carried out between two and twelve times a year, depending on the footway or carriageway being inspected. i.e. Town centre footways, with a large footfall were inspected monthly, whereas smaller residential street with a lower footfall were inspected six monthly.

 

The reactive inspections were caused by a report of defect from members of the public, Councillors, Council Officers and the Police. A member asked how long after an inspection would a footpath be repaired. The officer stated that for an emergency repair, the time was 24 working hours, if not the standard policy was 28 days. He added that this sometimes slips, especially during the winter as there are often more repairs needed i.e. potholes.

 

 

Planned and ad hoc highway tree inspections – There were some 20,000 trees on the public highway which were the responsibility of the Council.  This together with some 40,000-50,000 trees within parks, made a very large work programme of maintenance. Inspections are carried out in accordance to the individual tree species requirements.  Larger trees were inspected and pruned every three years, smaller species of tree were inspected and pruned every five years. There were also ad hoc works as a result of storm damage; vehicle damage and disease which may have include specific species related diseases.

 

Constant monitoring and inspections are carried out throughout the year as officers travel to and from their scheduled inspection areas.  All inspections are carried out by a qualified tree officer. There were three Aboricultural Officers and one Tree Preservation Officer.  During inspections information such as species, size, condition and appropriate works that are required are programmed into the tree database and passed to the corporate contractor for completion.

 

New Roads and Street Works Assessment (NRSWA) Inspections – All utility works undertaken within Havering were co-ordinated and checked upon by the Councils NRSWA team.  The only exception to this was due to emergency work, where only two hours notice is necessary.  If work is scheduled, then the Council can say no to the utility company if they decide to.

 

Every opening made by the utility is recorded on the database, and once the work is completed and the highway has been reinstated, an onsite inspection is undertaken to ensure that the work carried out is to the necessary standard.  These checks ensure that the structural integrity of the public highway has not been compromised by the excavations that have taken place.

 

Member raised concerns about the pavements in Hornchurch Town Centre as they needed levelling out.  The officer present agreed to pass this to Regeneration, who was responsible for the current improvements.

 

Street Lighting Inspections

 

The Committee was informed that planned night scouting was carried out  ...  view the full minutes text for item 28.

29.

COMMITTEE'S ANNUAL REPORT pdf icon PDF 160 KB

The Committee will receive a report on work carried out in the last municipal year.

 

The Committee are asked to agree the content and authorise the Chairman to sign off the final version.

 

Minutes:

The Committee received a report on the work that had been carried out over the last municipal year.  The items discussed at this meeting would be included in the final report before it was signed off by the Chairman.

 

The Committee agreed the contents and authorised the Chairman to sign off the final version.

 

30.

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION pdf icon PDF 241 KB

The Committee will be updated on the latest Service Performance Information.

 

Minutes:

The Committee received details of the service performance indicators within its remit. The indicators were noted.